Loading
Premier Roger Cook has insisted the agencies overseeing plans by billionaire Gina Rinehart to build a $250 million mixed-use development across the site of a century-old West Perth home are well-equipped to “get the balance right”, after revelations there were no legislative barriers preventing its demolition.
On Monday, WAtoday revealed the mega-development spanning four lots on Outram and Ord Streets would require the demolition of a 120-year-old Federation-style home that had sheltered soldiers, esteemed surgeons and a world-renowned artist.
At a press conference this morning, the premier pointed out the development was still subject to formal review by the WA Planning Commission and other agencies capable of striking the delicate balance between development and heritage.
“I will make the observation that that development is still subject to planning processes, and obviously, we want to do two things in Western Australia: we want to see our community become vibrant and new, and to see development associated with that, and we also want to protect our cultural heritage in an appropriate way,” Cook said.
“That’s why we have our Heritage Council and the local government authorities with the [WA Planning Commission], working together to get that balance right.
“It’s not a binary proposition – it’s not that you’re either heritage-listed or you’re not.”
Cook also rejected suggestions the situation was evidence of a loophole in WA’s heritage laws, insisting there was a range of protections afforded to properties deemed to be of cultural significance.
The ‘work meets wellness’ development, which spans the 7000 square metres between 27-35 Outram Street and 46 Ord Street in West Perth, comprises a mix of office, gym, wellness spaces, restaurants and serviced apartments opposite the company’s headquarters.
The plan has been lodged via the WA government’s new expedited pathway for developments of state significance — which guarantees a determination within 120 days.
A spokesman for Rinehart declined multiple requests to answer questions on the development, but maintained there were no heritage-listed properties on the designated sites.
Read the full article here
